UFC rankings are predominantly based on past and current fighter results. How do the UFC rankings work in detail? Who are the media outlets that rank UFC fighters, and most importantly, just how eligible are they? Rankings were generated by a voting panel made up of media members. The media members were asked to vote for who they feel are the top fighters in the UFC by weight-class and pound-for-pound. A fighter is only eligible to be voted on if they are in active status in the UFC.
A fighter can appear in more than one weight division at a time. The champion and interim champion are considered to be in the top positions of their respective divisions and therefore are not eligible for voting by weight-class. The higher wage may also have attracted more skilled or industrious people to the job, but this seems to account for at most a small portion of the improvements in patient health. What does the best pound for pound mean?
How is UFC pound for pound rankings determined? Who is pound for pound best UFC? What is a P4P? What are the pros and cons of pay for performance? I've heard this term being thrown around for years. In boxing and now in MMA. What does it really mean though? The question has been thrown out Fedor would be right? I mean GSP is lbs weigh in weigh Anderson is They would get destroyed by Fedor. All day, everyday. So why all the discussion. Thank you. Sugar Ray was considered best P4P in boxing and he wasn't a heavyweight.
It means if you compare 2 fighters from different weight classes, which one would be the best if weight wasn't a factor or if you were to magically 'equalize them' to the same weight. In other words, if you took BJ Penn and 'grew him' to Fedor's weight, with the same proportions and skills, then you would compare them to see who is better.
Click to expand Pound for pound is the only way to size up two fighters from different weight classes or even two differnet combat sports. It is not to say that should 1PFP v. You are taking into account the number of fights they have had. The number of fights that they have lost. The quality of opponent they have beaten.
The number of various ways that they can beat an opponent. You don't look at whether Fedor could beat Faber. Of course he could but does that make him a better all around fighter? No it does not. But just for the record Fedor is a better fighter than Faber. Now if you have two fighters in the same weight class then by all means they can settle the PFP question in the ring.
Before Sugar Ray, Benny Leonard was the first fighter that word applied to and he was a lightweight he went bouts without a loss over a 9 year stretch. So I guess record does play a role in the whole P4P title. So Fedor can be considered the man.
0コメント